Model Hybrid Filantropi: Integrasi Dana Sosial dan Kewirausahaan Sosial untuk Pemberdayaan Berbasis Data
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71155/monetarium.v2i2.164Keywords:
Hybrid Philanthropy; Social Entrepreneurship; Social Funds; Community Empowerment; Impact Based DataAbstract
This research aims to conceptualize a hybrid philanthropy model that systematically integrates social funds and social entrepreneurship as a framework for advancing data driven community empowerment. Philanthropic practices in Indonesia have traditionally been dominated by charitable and consumptive approaches that yield limited and unsustainable social outcomes. In contrast, social entrepreneurship offers significant potential to address structural social challenges through innovative, market oriented mechanisms, yet its progress remains constrained by insufficient access to capital. This study employed a qualitative descriptive design with an exploratory case study approach. It investigated the practices of philanthropic institutions, social entrepreneurs, and beneficiary communities. Data were collected through in depth interviews, participant observation, document analysis, and an extensive literature review. The data were then analyzed using Miles and Huberman’s interactive model, which consisted of data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing. The research showed that the success of integration is determined by the availability and quality of structured data systems. Disparities in data access and the weak evidence base are the main obstacles in planning and evaluating philanthropic programs. Through the hybrid philanthropy model, this study develops a framework connecting three key components: (1) social funding as a source of financial resources and legitimacy, (2) social entrepreneurship as a driver of empowerment through innovative business models, and (3) impact based data systems as the foundation for accountability, efficiency, and targeting accuracy. The integration of these components results in a social impact hierarchy that illustrates the logical flow from inputs, processes, to outcomes and long term impacts. The implementation of this model has the potential to shift the paradigm of philanthropy in Indonesia from charity based to investment based, while strengthening the social economic resilience of communities through an evidence based empowerment ecosystem.
References
Bacq, S., & Janssen, F. (2011). The multiple faces of social entrepreneurship: A review of definitional issues based on geographical and thematic criteria. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 23(5–6), 373–403.
Battilana, J., Lee, M., Walker, J., & Dorsey, C. (2015). In search of the hybrid ideal. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 13(3), 51–55.
BAZNAS & PIRAC. (2023). Laporan Potensi dan Realisasi Zakat Nasional 2023.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
British Council. (2018). The State of Social Enterprise in Indonesia. In Retrieved from https://www.britishcouncil.id.
CAF. (2023). World Giving Index 2023: A global view of giving trends. Charities Aid Foundation. https://www.cafonline.org
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Dees, J. G. (1998). The meaning of social entrepreneurship.
Defourny, J., & Yssens, M. (2017). Fundamentals for an international typology of social enterprise models. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 8(6), 2469–2497.
Hassan, M. K., & Aliyu, S. (2018). Islamic Social Finance: Waqf, Zakat and Sadaqah for Poverty Alleviation and Sustainable Development. Palgrave Macmillan.
Kania, J., & Kramer, M. (2011). Collective impact. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 9(1), 36–41.
Kettunen, P. (2015). The role of data in evidence-based social policy. European Journal of Social Science Research, 28(4), 379–393.
McKinsey Global Institute. (2018). The Age of Analytics: Competing in a Data-Driven World.
Nicholls, A. (2010). The legitimacy of social entrepreneurship: Reflexive isomorphism in a pre–paradigmatic field. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(4), 611–633.
Nicholls, A., & Cho, A. H. (2006). Social entrepreneurship: The structuration of a field. (In A. Nich). Oxford University Press.
Nicholls, A., & Pharoah, C. (2008). The Landscape of Social Investment: A Holistic Topology of Opportunities and Challenges.
PIRAC. (2022). Indeks Filantropi Indonesia 2022. Public Interest Research and Advocacy Center.
Saebi, T., Foss, N. J., & Linder, S. (2019). Social entrepreneurship research: Past achievements and future promises. Journal of Management, 45(1), 70–95.
Salamon, L. M. (2014). Leverage for Good: An Introduction to the New Frontiers of Philanthropy and Social Investment. Oxford University Press.
Suryanto, A. (2021). Strategi transformasi filantropi Islam menuju pemberdayaan masyarakat. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Pembangunan Islam, 7(1), 45–60.
UNDP, & ISEA. (2020). Unlocking the potential of social enterprises for inclusive development in Indonesia. United Nations Development Programme & Indonesia Social Enterprise Association.
Yin, R. K. (2016). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
Yunus, M., Moingeon, B., & Lehmann-Ortega, L. (2010). Building social business models: Lessons from the Grameen experience. Long Range Planning, 4(2–3), 308–325.
Zimmerman, M. A. (2000). Empowerment theory: Psychological, organizational, and community levels of analysis. (In J. Rapp). , Handbook of Community Psychology (pp. 43–63).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 A. Fahmi Zakariya, S.Sos., M.E, Ika Nazilatur Rosida, S.Sos., M.E (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.